Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 2000 17:34:46 -0500
Message-Id:	<200002102234.RAA22091@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<via6ask53607luais7q8s4urq3gisdpmkh@4ax.com> (message from Damian
	Yerrick on Thu, 10 Feb 2000 21:21:31 GMT)
Subject:	Re: random.c and the advertising clause of the old BSD license
References:	<via6ask53607luais7q8s4urq3gisdpmkh AT 4ax DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> According to http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html the "advertising
> clause" has recently been removed from the BSD license, but random.c
> from the libc sources has not been updated to reflect this.  If I will
> be using random.c in projects in other compilers (I have to make the
> same pseudorandom numbers appear on all platforms), do I have to
> advertise UC Berkeley and its contributors?

I think you answered your own question.

Feel free to submit patches to fix the copyright statements.

- Raw text -