From:	Jason Green <news AT jgreen4 DOT fsnet DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Executable size: limit to acceptability?
Date:	Mon, 17 Jan 2000 21:09:21 +0000
Organization:	Customer of Planet Online
Lines:	10
Message-ID:	<66178s4ikrcjf3admm9mbc6gcbf39heg1r@4ax.com>
References:	<388300BC DOT FF52A0CF AT ma DOT tum DOT de> <B0000116043 AT stargate DOT astr DOT lu DOT lv>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	modem-108.bismuth.dialup.pol.co.uk
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk 948143695 27417 62.136.41.108 (17 Jan 2000 21:14:55 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	17 Jan 2000 21:14:55 GMT
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote:

> -O6 is identical with -O3 for GCC. If somebody uses PGCC then -O6 
> really turns on additional optimizations. So for normal users -O2 is 
> usually the best.

I am curious how many people in this group use PGCC, and what for.  Is
it just for speed-freaks ;) or are there other reasons for using it?  

And what would it take to install if I just want to try it out?

- Raw text -