delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sun, 21 Nov 1999 10:25:52 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Jochen Palmer <jpalmer AT myokay DOT net> |
cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: AT&T assembler PLEASE HELP |
In-Reply-To: | <000801bf3367$5549a100$0100a8c0@terminator> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.991121102525.25798T@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Jochen Palmer wrote: > Error: no such 386 instruction: 'pushfd'.=20 > > But that's not true. I know I have to use a diffrent syntax fot AT&T = > assembler compared to Intel assembler, but what should I use instead of = > 'popfd' ? 'shr' for example worked without problems.=20 Use either pushfl ot just pushf (and similarly for popf).
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |