delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | esox1999 AT my-deja DOT com |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | A way to go ring0 with gcc, to deal with virtual addresses ? |
Date: | Wed, 10 Nov 1999 11:53:12 GMT |
Organization: | Deja.com - Before you buy. |
Lines: | 23 |
Message-ID: | <80bmb7$luc$1@nnrp1.deja.com> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | 129.234.4.10 |
X-Article-Creation-Date: | Wed Nov 10 11:26:33 1999 GMT |
X-Http-User-Agent: | Mozilla/4.61 [en] (WinNT; I) |
X-Http-Proxy: | 1.0 wwwcache.dur.ac.uk:8080 (Squid/2.2.STABLE2), 1.0 x29.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 129.234.86.47, 129.234.4.10 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Hi, I try to go ring0 with gcc. I use a pentium with w95. I know it is possible to go ring0, I've read an article which shows the trick : http://asmjournal.freeservers.com/issues/ apj_1.txt but it is the intel asm syntax in this article. I'd like to do the same with the AT&T syntax. Do anyone know how to do that, and if there is an exemple somewhere ? Actually, I can't find the equivalent for the opcodes such as sidt, sldt in the AT&T syntax. My aim is to access the physical addresses. Thanks a lot for any help, Jul. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |