From:	Clemens Valens <c DOT valensNOc DOT SPAM AT mindless DOT com DOT invalid>
Subject:	independent jpeg group library problem
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Message-ID:	<000b8d9b.f8dd8b66@usw-ex0101-003.remarq.com>
Lines:	22
Bytes:	920
X-Originating-Host:	164.138.33.34
Organization:	http://www.remarq.com: The World's Usenet/Discussions Start Here
X-Wren-Trace:	eFRxWVhBBkwHFw5KUBhQU1VnSVhfVBhHQksVVFJNDUUNBloECUwPCQsbAwU=
Date:	Thu, 30 Sep 1999 13:51:39 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host:	10.0.2.3
X-Complaints-To:	wrenabuse AT remarq DOT com
X-Trace:	WReNphoon3 938725203 10.0.2.3 (Thu, 30 Sep 1999 14:00:03 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Thu, 30 Sep 1999 14:00:03 PDT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Does anybody have any experience with the jpeg library from the
Independent JPEG Group and DJGPP?

I have build the package with DJGPP and got the same warning with two
files (jcmainct.c & jdmainct.c), something like "main is usually a
function". The rest compiles just fine, using the correct makefile and
config file.

When I run the self test (make test) only two tests are correct:
testorig.jpg is identical to testoutt.jpg and testimg.bmp is identical
to testout.bmp. All other files are different. When I inspect the files
with a viewer it turns out that when the input is a green rose, the
output is a red rose and vice versa. Recompiling doesn't help any.

Does anybody recognize this problem and knows a solution?

Thanks in advance,
Clemens


* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!

- Raw text -