From:	Rez <rividh DOT minusthispart AT earthlink DOT net>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Borland Pascal to C translator
Date:	Thu, 23 Sep 1999 23:39:01 -0700
References:	<Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 9909210954060 DOT 53478-100000 AT ieva01 DOT lanet DOT lv> <B0000102620 AT stargate DOT astr DOT lu DOT lv> <37E7A409 DOT A57C008D AT ma DOT tum DOT de> <37E87C23 DOT BFD AT earthlink DOT net> <25d0e1ac DOT d7c5617f AT usw-ex0107-056 DOT remarq DOT com>
X-Posted-Path-Was:	not-for-mail
X-ELN-Date:	24 Sep 1999 06:36:10 GMT
X-ELN-Insert-Date:	Thu Sep 23 23:45:03 1999
Organization:	Offworld Press
Lines:	16
Mime-Version:	1.0
NNTP-Posting-Host:	1cust160.tnt4.lancaster.ca.da.uu.net
Message-ID:	<37EB1C85.4C49@earthlink.net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 3.04 (Win16; I)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Clemens Valens wrote:
> 
> I have tried PTOC not so long ago to convert PASCAL to C
> and it seemed to do the job. I found however that the
> generated C-code was a kind of unreadable, so I translated
> my PASCAL sources myself, using almost only search 'n'
> replace operations:
<snip>
> If your source is not too large, this method, although
> stupid, might be preferable.

Thanks, this could be useful, as I do have some Pascal stuff I might
want to dump to C at some point.. multiple methods are a good thing to
have for when one falls down!

~REZ~

- Raw text -