Mail Archives: djgpp/1999/09/21/20:25:15
In Reply-To: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990921145950 DOT 19568E-100000 AT is>
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> No. But as I am a NEWBIE, there is more need for basic features than
>> the latest achievements.
>I don't understand what that means. Are you saying that conio.h in
>the DJGPP library lacks something? If so, what?
No.
Thank you for your message. Where does those misunderstandings
originate? Was my first posting so badly put?
I do not have (i.e. _did_ not have) any conio.h among my
header-files. But, as my djgpp-version is not the newest and because
I got it from a CD, it could well be truncated some way.
No sweat. I have the file now.
>> I just do not want to download the whole package because of one single
>> missing header-file.
>The DJGPP Web site has a page where you can download individual files:
I did not know that.
> http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/dl/ofc/
>(This URL is in the FAQ, btw; see section 4.5.)
Thank you. But English is not my mother language. "Files to download"
did not point me to "missing header-files". In the actual case,
finding the answer in the FAQ is rather not practicable.
As another reader of the group already sent me a version of conio.h,
the problem does no longer exist and I can only thank you again for
your interest in the matter. Believe me: I read the FAQ, I even
_use_ it. There are situations when any other solution is quicker
or more economic (in whichever way).
Bye,
Michael.
- Raw text -