Message-ID:	<37E2A84B.CA7C6083@pallen.dabsol.co.uk>
Date:	Fri, 17 Sep 1999 21:44:59 +0100
From:	Peter Allen <P DOT Allen AT pallen DOT dabsol DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: An updated DOS - Please discuss
References:	<37d7913a DOT 10901976 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net> <37d8570d$0$14670 AT mojo DOT crosslink DOT net> <37d9bd34 DOT 955844 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net> <7rfieg$70a$1 AT Mars DOT mcs DOT net> <37DC0C7A DOT 56537E8C AT btinternet DOT com> <37dcadd6 DOT 336383 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net> <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 16 DOT 19990914092823 DOT 2a8fd70e AT mail DOT cybercable DOT fr> <37e23345 DOT 12707442 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Michael Kearns wrote:
<big snip>
> Scandisk doesn't count, as fsck can take just as long :o)

If you have multiple partitions (as you should IMHO (not wishing to
start a flame war)) then fsck will take virtually no time (<5 secs
on my k6-3) I can see your point if you have a single 10Gb partition
though.

			Peter Allen

- Raw text -