Message-ID:	<37E0C890.9EB9957E@pmail.net>
Date:	Thu, 16 Sep 1999 12:38:08 +0200
From:	Fred Backman <fredrick DOT backman AT pmail DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	vim (Re: editor)
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990915155309 DOT 29404B-100000 AT is> <7rq5de$t2r$3 AT ctb-nnrp2 DOT saix DOT net>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Risking a flamewar here but we're using vim, the MS-DOS version of the infamous
"vi" editor, which is very for unix-gone-msdos programmers who miss a descent
editor :-)

Stefan Viljoen wrote:

> True - I personally prefer to use SET's editor - powerful and IMHO easier to
> get into than RHIDE. Admitted it is not an IDE, merely an editor, but it
> does have very powerful features, a familiar tvision interface (what that
> means is it looks and acts like a classic Borland IDE, just like RHIDE does)
> and it is FREE.

--
Fred Backman
Lead Wizard
Binary Spells
www.binaryspells.com

- Raw text -