Sender:	root AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<37DFF2A1.7D9A815D@inti.gov.ar>
Date:	Wed, 15 Sep 1999 16:25:21 -0300
From:	salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization:	INTI
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.38 i686)
X-Accept-Language:	es-AR, en, es
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: An updated DOS - Please discuss
References:	<37d7913a DOT 10901976 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net> <37d9bd34 DOT 955844 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net> <7rfieg$70a$1 AT Mars DOT mcs DOT net> <37ddafe0 DOT 858354 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net> <7rks8h$1llt$1 AT Mars DOT mcs DOT net> <37dfba17 DOT 26621229 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Michael Kearns wrote:

> On 14 Sep 1999 02:08:01 -0500, les AT Mars DOT mcs DOT net (Leslie Mikesell) wrote:
>
> >In article <37ddafe0 DOT 858354 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net>,
> >Michael Kearns <michael AT toobie DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> wrote:
> >But the whole point of DOS is that it just loads applications and
> >lets them take over the machine.  If you enhance it, it won't
> >be DOS anymore and it will probably be a lot worse than the
> >well tested alternatives.
>
> If that were the case, you could never *ever* have a dos emulation under
> another operating system. After all, does Linux unload itself when using
> DOSEmu ? I don't think so.

Nope but:

1) Is ultra slow.
2) You lose a access to a lot of resources.
3) It can hang the Linux.

SET

--
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Visit my home page: http://welcome.to/SetSoft or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
                    set AT ieee DOT org set-soft AT bigfoot DOT com
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA Phone: +(5411) 4759 0013

- Raw text -