From:	"Matthew" <104522 DOT 404 AT compuserve DOT invalid>
Subject:	Re: WARNING: DOS is about to die.
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<7quo1t$94k$1 AT solomon DOT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu> <37D2ECE3 DOT 9BB2B63E AT unb DOT ca> <37D46EBF DOT 22AAC1C4 AT hmc DOT edu>
Message-ID:	<01befe96$5b45c080$58106ecb@matthew1>
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161
Lines:	24
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ip88.net.voyager.co.nz
X-Trace:	ozemail.com.au 937302602 203.110.16.88 (Tue, 14 Sep 1999 19:50:02 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Tue, 14 Sep 1999 19:50:02 EST
Organization:	OzEmail Ltd, Australia
Distribution:	world
Date:	Tue, 14 Sep 1999 09:50:02 GMT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Micro$oft rewrote Windoze NT and it still turned out to be a dog...
-- 
Replace the .invalid with .com to reply via e-mail

Nate Eldredge <neldredge AT hmc DOT edu> wrote in article
<37D46EBF DOT 22AAC1C4 AT hmc DOT edu>...
> Endlisnis wrote:
> > Word from Microsoft is that they will not be able to get
> > a 64-bit version of Windows out until ~2003, and it will be a
complete re-write
> > (because of the large penalty for executing 32-bit code on the
Merced
> > processor).
> 
> "Complete rewrite" sounds unlikely to me.  There is already NT for
the
> Alpha, and I doubt it was a complete rewrite.
> 
> The 32-bit code can be got rid of just by recompiling, and I doubt
the
> architecture differences require *that* much work.  But I suppose
it's
> possible that Microsoft's code is so screwed up that it really is
> necessary...

- Raw text -