delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Thu, 2 Sep 1999 10:58:46 +0300 (IDT) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Gisle Vanem <giva AT bryggen DOT bgnett DOT no> |
cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: OS/2 + delay() bug |
In-Reply-To: | <Pine.UW2.3.95.990901232127.24353A-100000@bryggen.bgnett.no> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.990902105607.4794N-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Gisle Vanem wrote: > It's probably a bug in emulation of Int15h/86. AFAIK Win-NT has a > similar problem with delay(). Better to use usleep() altogether. A problem with `usleep' is that it has a 55-msec granularity; `delay' has a 1-msec granularity. If you need delays smaller than 55 msec, you might try writing your own loop that calls `uclock'. (I don't know whether `uclock' works well on OS/2.)
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |