Message-ID:	<37C98E40.E0DF9375@unb.ca>
From:	Endlisnis <s257m AT unb DOT ca>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: DJGPP (gcc) and Borland IDE
References:	<37C047CA DOT DAE5F79C AT bigfoot DOT com> <37C15F25 DOT 2003401A AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> <37C5A692 DOT B41EE156 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Lines:	29
Date:	Sun, 29 Aug 1999 23:54:43 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	198.164.188.196
X-Trace:	news20.bellglobal.com 935970883 198.164.188.196 (Sun, 29 Aug 1999 19:54:43 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Sun, 29 Aug 1999 19:54:43 EDT
Organization:	Sympatico
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

François Jacques wrote:

> Sorry dudes for the delay , I've been busy these last days... =)
> salvador wrote:
> > > 1. I need to configure Borland IDE to use GCC with C/CPP files. That is,
> > > set gcc as my C/CPP translator. Probably no prob there but haven't tried
> > > it yet.
> >
> > I think that's impossible. I'm registered user of BC++ 3.1, I paid 350 dollars
> > for this crap (back in 1993). I think that's impossible because the compiler and
> > linker are *inside* the IDE. So the IDE doesn't call external programs and
> > doesn't collect the errors from any program.
> Would surprise me a lot! They would have two compiler editions? One embedded in the
> IDE and one command line? Why would they do so? As a decent software engineer, I
> would rather exec() the compiler and reuse the output in the IDE.

    It is true, there is an imbedded version of the compiler built into the IDE.  This
is simple to prove, first of all, they have a counter which displays how many lines of
code have been currently compiled.  And the most significant bit of proof, is that you
can remove the command-line compiler and the IDE will still compile just fine.
--
     (\/) Endlisnis (\/)
          s257m AT unb DOT ca
          Endlisnis AT HotMail DOT com
          ICQ: 32959047

- Raw text -