From:	"Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH]" <cp1v45 AT NortelNetworks DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: fall of rsxntdj??
Date:	Fri, 20 Aug 1999 12:32:34 -0400
Organization:	Nortel Networks
Lines:	19
Message-ID:	<37BD8321.77097C7@NortelNetworks.com>
References:	<37B76E28 DOT 72198225 AT geocities DOT com> <013u3.523$ei1 DOT 1216 AT newsfeeds DOT bigpond DOT com> <7pe6ns$kil$1 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <Vh9v3.2505$ei1 DOT 5232 AT newsfeeds DOT bigpond DOT com> <37bd4e15 DOT 3130570 AT news DOT uswest DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	bmerhc00.ca.nortel.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/712)
X-Accept-Language:	en
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Matthew Haley wrote:

> I would love to give RSXNTDJ another try as long as you could run it
> under *real* dos. LFNs wouldn't be the problem (I found a TSR to fix
> that :) but I don't like Win32 console programs (i.e. Cygwin).

    OK, I have never used RSXNTDJ, but from what I understand, it an
extention that allows compiling of code that uses the Win32 api.  It seems
silly to make a Win32 application that would work in REAL dos, because non of
the Win32 api would be available (it would be just like DJGPP).

    On the other hand, where did you get this TSR that allows LFN on real
dos?

--
     -Rolf Campbell (39)3-6318

- Raw text -