Mail Archives: djgpp/1999/08/11/08:05:23
Chris Holmes wrote:
>
> Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH] wrote:
> >
> > David Mitchell wrote:
> >
> > > Orvbongat wrote in message <19990808174528 DOT 20888 DOT 00009160 AT ng-fe1 DOT aol DOT com>...
> > > >Which is one is a better IDE...Rhide or EMACS?
> > > A matter of opinion really. I prefer RHIDE, because it has that familiar
> > > DOS feel, but I'm sure a UNIX boffin would be scoffing at this and would be
> > > able to name a thousand reasons which make emacs better.
> >
> > Well, as I have used both extensively, I would say that Emacs is better for
> > editing code, if only for it's smart indention (which is configurable for your
> > indention style). But RHIDE is much easier to setup/use [especially for users
> > of Borland C++ v3.1]. And the debugging capabilities in RHIDE just kick-ass.
>
> May I interject that Qedit, (I use the 92 version) is still the best
> editor out there? It does auto-indenting based on file extension, etc.
> etc. And is just sweet.
>
> -- signed, a young old fart.
How is the debugging?
-Mike
- Raw text -