Message-ID:	<37AFA058.634C@ns.sympatico.ca>
From:	Klaas <klaas AT ns DOT sympatico DOT ca>
Organization:	N/A
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 3.04 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: RHIDE AND EMACS...Which one is better?
References:	<19990808174528 DOT 20888 DOT 00009160 AT ng-fe1 DOT aol DOT com> <934174532 DOT 375811 AT kyle DOT inet DOT net DOT nz> <37AEF07E DOT F8CD0F4A AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com> <37AF4F97 DOT 60D9 AT surfsouth DOT com> <37AF9823 DOT 58C2 AT ns DOT sympatico DOT ca> <37AF9878 DOT 6412 AT surfsouth DOT com>
Lines:	15
Date:	Tue, 10 Aug 1999 00:45:28 -0300
NNTP-Posting-Host:	142.177.75.52
X-Trace:	sapphire.mtt.net 934256701 142.177.75.52 (Tue, 10 Aug 1999 00:45:01 ADT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Tue, 10 Aug 1999 00:45:01 ADT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Chris Holmes wrote:
> 
> Klaas wrote:
> >
> > How is the debugging?
> 
>   As good as you are.  I can't stand IDE's.  They're big, nasty, slow,
> and won't tell you as much as a good compiler.  But that's just my
> opinion.

Big? Not necessarily.  Slow? What do you use, an 86?  Nasty? I like
being able to compile and link my five-part program in seconds using
"Alt-r, r" in rhide...

-Mike

- Raw text -