From:	Chris Holmes <cholmes AT surfsouth DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: RHIDE AND EMACS...Which one is better?
Date:	Mon, 09 Aug 1999 23:11:52 -0400
Organization:	Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta GA, USA
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<37AF9878.6412@surfsouth.com>
References:	<19990808174528 DOT 20888 DOT 00009160 AT ng-fe1 DOT aol DOT com> <934174532 DOT 375811 AT kyle DOT inet DOT net DOT nz> <37AEF07E DOT F8CD0F4A AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com> <37AF4F97 DOT 60D9 AT surfsouth DOT com> <37AF9823 DOT 58C2 AT ns DOT sympatico DOT ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	r69h109.res.gatech.edu
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news-int.gatech.edu 934255215 27764 128.61.69.109 (10 Aug 1999 03:20:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT news DOT gatech DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Date:	10 Aug 1999 03:20:15 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 3.04Gold (Win95; I)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Klaas wrote:
> 
> How is the debugging?

  As good as you are.  I can't stand IDE's.  They're big, nasty, slow,
and won't tell you as much as a good compiler.  But that's just my 
opinion.

  Chris

-- 
I know that I will never be politically correct,
and I don't give a damn about my lack of etiquette!
-- Meatloaf

- Raw text -