delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl AT earthlink DOT net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: Decompiler Question. |
Date: | Mon, 02 Aug 1999 02:19:31 -0400 |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990801120011 DOT 20304b-100000 AT is> <37A52432 DOT 60703C94 AT megsinet DOT net> |
X-Posted-Path-Was: | not-for-mail |
X-Accept-Language: | en |
X-ELN-Date: | 2 Aug 1999 06:17:53 GMT |
X-ELN-Insert-Date: | Sun Aug 1 23:35:02 1999 |
Organization: | Nocturnal Aviation |
Lines: | 17 |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | dialup-209.246.80.161.newyork2.level3.net |
Message-ID: | <37A53873.71E545D2@earthlink.net> |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win95; U) |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
David Oppenheimer wrote: > > I must strenuously disagree here. First, if disassembly were impossible, then > why would programmers waste their time programming disassemlers?! Please note the subject header. Decompilation is no disassembly. -- Martin Ambuhl mambuhl AT earthlink DOT net __________________________________________________________ Fight spam now! Get your free anti-spam service: http://www.brightmail.com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |