delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "Keith McCormick" <kdm98 AT spiritone DOT com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: Need help w/ building newest EGCS snapshot!!! |
Date: | 31 Jul 1999 10:24:21 GMT |
Organization: | <none> |
Lines: | 37 |
Message-ID: | <933416661.201411@ridge.spiritone.com> |
References: | <933412357 DOT 619909 AT ridge DOT spiritone DOT com> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | ridge.spiritone.com |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Newsreader: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 |
X-Trace-ISP: | 933416660 31802 208.130.243.212 hf5o/F36:xqz98 |
X-Complaints-To-ISP: | abuse at spiritone dot com |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Update: The build I am getting the error in was one that I had patched to PGCC and then patched to gcc295 for DJGPP. Just to see what would happen, I changed the build script to use the main gcc and not the one that was just built and I did not get that error. I am now rebuilding the gcc295 w/o the PGCC patches applied to see if the assembly error happens. I may be that the PGCC patches break something being that the diff files are for an older snapshot. KeithM Keith McCormick <kdm98 AT spiritone DOT com> wrote in message news:933412357 DOT 619909 AT ridge DOT spiritone DOT com... > I am trying to build the lastest snapshot (that is availible - version > 19990718) of EGCS and it only gets as far as a little ways to stage2. I > stops with an assembler error as it is compiling 'expmed.c'. I have > attached the log file and the assembly source that is causing the trouble. > > Another thing I might mention is that I have gotten a number of warnings > while building EGCS, such as 'const' discarded from pointer type, and > incorrect initialization for pointer type. Things still work up until the > stage 2 error so are the warnings just the result of sloppy coding > (something like that) and do not really affect the compiled item? > > One more question: Is the number that appears in an error or warning > statement a line number? > > KeithM > > > >
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |