Mail Archives: djgpp/1999/07/29/12:09:12
On Thu, 29 Jul 1999, Simon De Deyne wrote:
> Thanks for the answer! I did consider this way, but then,
> i also noticed that the seeding with the time function (srand) isn't
> as random as when i used the other random function.
Seed has nothing to do with randomness.
> > So to produce a random number between 0 and 99
> > x = rand() % 100;
The low bits of the random numbers are known to be not very random. If
you want more random results, try this (untested!):
x = ((double) rand ()) * 100 / RAND_MAX;
- Raw text -