Message-Id:	<199907281256.IAA23588@delorie.com>
From:	"Dan Gold" <TedMat AT CoastNet DOT com>
To:	<djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: 13h forerver (heyy)
Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 20:43:52 -0800
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Priority:	3
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

If you don't mind my asking, why would you map address 0xa0000? You could
always use _dos_ds and set the offset to 0xa0000. Would the point be to not
half to have an offset?

Thanks for letting me know...from Dan Gold...

            -=-=[CATACOMB ABYSS]=-=-
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Port/1547/


> From: Michael Stewart <mike AT reggin DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
> Subject: Re: 13h forerver (heyy)
> Date: Wednesday, July 28, 1999 1:13 AM
> 
> Eli Zaretskii wrote in message ...
> >
> >On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, conrad wrote:
> >
> >> info.size = 320*200;
> >> info.address = 0xa0000;
> >> __dpmi_physical_address_mapping (&info);
> >> my_ds = __dpmi_allocate_ldt_descriptors (1);
> >> __dpmi_set_segment_base_address (my_ds, info.address);
> >> __dpmi_set_segment_limit (my_ds, (320*200+5)|0xfff);
> >
...

- Raw text -