From:	clee2 AT envirolink DOT org (Chris Lee)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Hello World and File size
Date:	11 Jul 1999 15:47:42 GMT
Organization:	Your Organization
Lines:	14
Message-ID:	<7maeau$j64$1@autumn.news.rcn.net>
References:	<01bec8b3$69886440$LocalHost AT thendren> <3784c5e6 DOT 26155088 AT 207 DOT 69 DOT 128 DOT 130> <7m3h35$s4p$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com> <3785C141 DOT 38F7CAA5 AT silesia DOT top DOT pl>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	9KcHti4OTl9mFoUItD3N/WiTMhyPePXpWiCn7qFsXLI=
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT rcn DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	11 Jul 1999 15:47:42 GMT
X-No-Archive:	Yes
X-Newsreader:	WinVN 0.99.10 (beta 1) [de] (16bit)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <3785C141 DOT 38F7CAA5 AT silesia DOT top DOT pl>, wapex AT silesia DOT top DOT pl says...
>
>
>
>chongkong AT my-deja DOT com wrote:
>> 
>> is the object code by djgpp has a minimal size of 100k?
>> 
>link with -s option
>> and if you use packer would the program run at the same speed?
>you mean use djp to compress the exe, yes the same speed

DJP is obsolete, use UPX to compress the exe instead....

- Raw text -