Mail Archives: djgpp/1999/07/07/23:20:55
Nate Eldredge wrote:
> > That can have problems under windows as well. I've got rediculous
> > results under Win95/3.1 occasionally.
> Presumably because your program is scheduled out. You'll have problems
> like that under any multitasking OS, unless it provides some way to find
> the CPU time used by a process (and this is typically accurate only to
> the nearest timeslice, which is usually *at least* 1 ms).
I knew Win9x was messing with the counter when I the counter got smaller
between succesive calls. (only happened twice though).
(\/) Endlisnis (\/)
s257m AT unb DOT ca
Endlisnis AT HotMail DOT com
- Raw text -