Sender:	"Rolf Campbell" <cp1v45 AT nortelnetworks DOT com>
Message-ID:	<377A4A02.1088BD5E@americasm01.nt.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:46:58 -0400
From:	"Rolf Campbell" <cp1v45 AT nortelnetworks DOT com>
Organization:	Nortel Networks
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/712)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Bison and particular expressions.
References:	<01bec28b$24067c00$LocalHost AT thendren>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Christopher Nelson wrote:

> >    But, lexical tie-ins and scope resolution are not required for what I
> was
> >doing.  All I was oringinally trying to do was to find things that look
> like
> >function declarations.  I wasn't really conserned with validating the
> return
> >type.   In my parser:
> >
> >myType myFunc(int a, char**&);
> >
> >would be a valid prototype even if "myType" was not previously defined.  My
> >program is only designed to be run on code that cleanly compiles and thus
> does
> >not require strict validation of stuff like that.
>
> ah.  :-)  Occam's Razor.  what is it, like a source documentor?

    Right now, it's a program that (when integrated into SetEdit or RHIDE using
a provided eLisp function) displays the prototype of a (partially) typed
function name.  I posted (as Endlisnis) a link to the preliminary binary
distribution of it.  <Note:  Nortel Networks has no affiliation with Endlisnis
or any software he provides>

    Eventually, it will display lists of struct/class/union members when the
"." key is hit.  [hopefully, if I get support from SET] allowing you to just
choose from the list.  It also plans on doing many other things which appear in
some commercial IDE's.

--
     -Rolf Campbell

- Raw text -