Message-ID:	<37768BB3.B53E7258@silesia.top.pl>
Date:	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 23:38:11 +0300
From:	Michal <wapex AT silesia DOT top DOT pl>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: gas + pand
References:	<377200C6 DOT F48435D AT silesia DOT top DOT pl> <3774F641 DOT 4AA785DF AT silesia DOT top DOT pl> <3775C757 DOT D51EAD0A AT cartsys DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Nate Eldredge wrote:
> 
> Michal wrote:
> >
> > Michal wrote:
> > >
> > > Gas i am currently using have problem with pand, it generates invalid
> > > opcodes for this instruction. Is there any newer bug free version of gas
> > > for djgpp?
> >
> > Halo out there!!!
> 
> The version on Simtelnet is the latest commonly available version.
> There are more recent versions but AFAIK nobody has ported them to
> DJGPP.
So you're saying that there is no version of gas for djgpp that is pand
bug free? It seems strange for me that such a serious and easy to
correct bug is still being kept is djgpp gas. Maybe if I had the latest
djgpp sources of gas, i could correct this bug be myself (I dont think
that they are in djgpp distribution, am i right?).
> 
> If you know the opcode, you can use .byte to insert it.  I think there
I use por than scan my function for por ocpodes and replace them with
pand.
> is also a source patch for this floating around somewhere; maybe someone
> will post it after reading this.
If someone have this patch, please post it.
> --
> 
> Nate Eldredge
> nate AT cartsys DOT com

- Raw text -