Sender:	root AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<3767CDA4.99E7E7EA@inti.gov.ar>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jun 1999 13:15:32 -0300
From:	salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization:	INTI
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686)
X-Accept-Language:	es-AR, en, es
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	allegro AT canvaslink DOT com
CC:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com,
	balug-lst AT balug DOT org DOT ar
Subject:	Re: [AL] Compilers comparisson, some opinions about the generated ,
	assembler
References:	<47568953 DOT 6 DOT 19732 AT mx1-13 DOT onmedia DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Tom St Denis wrote:

> btw, what is this thread (in the subject) actualy about?  testing
> compilers or windows?

Compilers ;-)), Eli just asked about slow downs and validity of results under
Windows. My answer is: no, the values of the assembler analysis aren't affected
by Windows. Only the K6-2 could be affected, but only some of the runs because I
verified some of them re-running in DOS. I'll also replace the values by
DOS+CWSDPMI results.

SET

--
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Visit my home page: http://welcome.to/SetSoft or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
                    set AT ieee DOT org set-soft AT bigfoot DOT com
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA Phone: +(5411) 4759 0013

- Raw text -