Message-Id:	<199906151650.MAA23053@delorie.com>
Sender:	root AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Tue, 15 Jun 1999 12:39:51 -0300
From:	salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization:	INTI
X-Accept-Language:	es-AR, en, es
To:	djgpp-announce AT delorie DOT com, allegro AT canvaslink DOT com, balug-lst AT balug DOT org DOT ar
Subject:	Compilers comparisson, some opinions about the generated assembler
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi All:

  Me again with the gcc/egcs/pgcc/MSVC/Watcom comparisson.
  This time I took the "Numeric Sort" benchmark (the simplest) and analysed the
code generated by egcs and MSVC, then I wrote some conclutions. Even when
I focused in this particular case I think the conclutions are right because MSVC
generates code that is overall faster than egcs.
  There are some aligment issues and also optimizations faults (from part of
egcs) and some stuff related to the fact that Pentium processors have two
execution units.

http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/compila.html

SET

P.D. For the BALUG people: Disculpen el ingles ;-)

--
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Visit my home page: http://welcome.to/SetSoft or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
                    set AT ieee DOT org set-soft AT bigfoot DOT com
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA Phone: +(5411) 4759 0013

- Raw text -