Sender:	nate AT cartsys DOT com
Message-ID:	<375ECCFD.289B9AF0@cartsys.com>
Date:	Wed, 09 Jun 1999 13:22:21 -0700
From:	Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.08 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.10 i586)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: ECGS, DJGPP & GCC -- what's the difference
References:	<7jk854$3atp2$1 AT titan DOT xtra DOT co DOT nz> <375DFDD5 DOT 6095CC24 AT a DOT crl DOT com> <375f64f8 DOT 3655464 AT news>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Stuart Hall wrote:
> 
> Very interesting question.  So why would I want to use ECGS and not
> GCC, or vice versa?  Is one or the other more compliant with the ANSI
> C++ standard by any chance?

EGCS has been undergoing much more rapid development.  Its C++ support
is said to be much better, several bugs are fixed, optimization is
better, etc.

It may be less stable, though.  (Less in-house testing, though more
external testing.)

Personally, I use EGCS for almost everything under Linux, and haven't
had any problems.
-- 

Nate Eldredge
nate AT cartsys DOT com

- Raw text -