delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "Steve Ball" <steve AT effectivejava DOT com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: how compliant? |
Date: | Tue, 8 Jun 1999 18:58:13 +1200 |
Organization: | Customer of Telecom Internet Services |
Lines: | 11 |
Message-ID: | <7jif28$3asjg$1@titan.xtra.co.nz> |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990606113300 DOT 16109S-100000 AT is> <375bd1a0 DOT 7891186 AT news> <37602ad0 DOT 6670238 AT news> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | 203-96-100-124.dialup.xtra.co.nz |
X-Trace: | titan.xtra.co.nz 928825224 3502704 203.96.100.124 (8 Jun 1999 07:00:24 GMT) |
X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT xtra DOT co DOT nz |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | 8 Jun 1999 07:00:24 GMT |
X-Newsreader: | Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
>If anyone knows of a list of where GCC is not compliant I would >appreciate it. On a previous posting in this thread someone said that GCC supported namespaces, but my DJGPP says "sorry, not implemented yet". I thought I had the latest version. Do I? Neither DJGPP nor RHIDE recognise the export keyword. Also the system header <limits> is missing so the numeric_limits<> template is unavailable.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |