From:	noname AT noname DOT org (Stuart Hall)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: how compliant?
Date:	Mon, 07 Jun 1999 20:27:52 GMT
Organization:	Connix Internet
Lines:	40
Message-ID:	<37602ad0.6670238@news>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990606113300 DOT 16109S-100000 AT is> <375bd1a0 DOT 7891186 AT news>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	m5.aetna.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.5/32.452
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

although, I think I just read on the ecgs site that namespaces are
implemented in a funky, fake sort of way.  I think the next major
release of GCC will implement them properly, as well as some other
updates (like more efficiency).

If anyone knows of a list of where GCC is not compliant I would
appreciate it.  Eli had a suggestion about the docs that come with the
.zip file, but I had no luck there.

Stuart

On Mon, 07 Jun 1999 14:06:04 GMT, noname AT noname DOT org (Stuart Hall) so
kindly spent valuable time writing:

>It's also pretty compliant on the C++ front.  It can do things like
>namespaces (only a recent addition to the ANSI C++ standard).
>
>
>On Sun, 6 Jun 1999 11:33:53 +0300 (IDT), Eli Zaretskii
><eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> so kindly spent valuable time writing:
>
>>
>>On Sat, 5 Jun 1999, Tobias Blomkvist wrote:
>>
>>> Can anyone tell me how ANSI/ISO-compliant the DJGPP-compiler is?
>>
>>DJGPP is fully compliant with ANSI/ISO C89 standard, and has some of
>>the functionality required by the 2 Standard Amendments.
>
>
>----
>Stuart Hall
>Connecticut, USA
>* return address:  f p r i n t f @ i n a m e . c o m *


----
Stuart Hall
Connecticut, USA
* return address:  f p r i n t f @ i n a m e . c o m *

- Raw text -