Message-ID:	<37533712.2CB224D2@hitech.net.au>
From:	leroy <leroy AT hitech DOT net DOT au>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ja
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: putpixel method
References:	<12907576 DOT 928170590243 DOT JavaMail DOT w-epost AT localhost> <375331E2 DOT 65A7180A AT cartsys DOT com>
Lines:	19
Date:	Tue, 01 Jun 1999 11:27:46 +1000
NNTP-Posting-Host:	203.27.197.43
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT telstra DOT net
X-Trace:	nswpull.telstra.net 928200825 203.27.197.43 (Tue, 01 Jun 1999 11:33:45 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Tue, 01 Jun 1999 11:33:45 EST
Organization:	Customer of Telstra Big Pond Direct
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Nate Eldredge wrote:

> Writing to video memory is not risky per se; the risk comes if you miss
> and write to some other kind of memory :)  In the above example, it
> might be wise (while debugging) to check that y < 200 and x < 320, and
> that you have the right number of zeros in 0xA0000.
> --

Isn't it 0xA000, only 3 zero's.  Thats the address I always write to and it
works.

The irony of it is pretty funny though.

Cheers,

leroy.

- Raw text -