From:	"Shaggs" <jud AT tminet DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: DJGPP with Win32-Support ?
Date:	Mon, 31 May 1999 17:03:30 -0700
Organization:	Posted via RemarQ Communities, Inc.
Lines:	13
Message-ID:	<928195268.012.80@news.remarQ.com>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990531162301 DOT 6693D-100000 AT is> <3752a9c4 DOT 17284868 AT news DOT luebeck DOT netsurf DOT de> <3752CE33 DOT 7790AB23 AT pallen DOT dabsol DOT co DOT uk> <3754d93b DOT 29437063 AT news DOT luebeck DOT netsurf DOT de>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	208.145.132.112
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Tue, 01 Jun 1999 00:01:08 GMT
X-Trace:	928195268.012.80 K8TBLZBRT8470D091C qube-01.us-ca.remarq.com
X-Complaints-To:	newsabuse AT remarQ DOT com
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

arent the sources available for djgpp? why deosnt someone try to do this?
^Hawk^ wrote in message <3754d93b DOT 29437063 AT news DOT luebeck DOT netsurf DOT de>...
>On Mon, 31 May 1999 19:00:19 +0100, Peter Allen
><P DOT Allen AT pallen DOT dabsol DOT co DOT uk> wrote:
>
>>> Why not ?
>>Because DJGPP is a dos compiler.
>Clear. But why not adding another package to include this ? It would
>be only one more package ... ;) ...
>
>Bye, ^Hawk^ - the DarkSoft-Productions @ www.darksoft.net

- Raw text -