Message-ID:	<006501bc604a$70167e60$4ff9c6c3@johans-dator>
From:	"Johan Henriksson" <johan DOT he AT telia DOT com>
To:	<djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Portability and size_t type related question
Date:	Wed, 14 May 1997 11:34:41 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

from Johan Henriksson, Sweden    HTTP://come.to/jhewok  |
Primary mail: johan DOT he AT telia DOT com                  #UIN 12035895
Second: jhe75 AT hotmail DOT com    Third: johan_he AT yahoo DOT com
Leadprogrammer and FX-specialist at Real software
http://come.to/real_software
*************************************************************************
-----Original Message-----
From: Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia <XXguille AT XXiies DOT XXes>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Date: Friday, May 14, 1999 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: Portability and size_t type related question


>El día Thu, 13 May 1999 17:15:36 +1000, Chris Mears
><chris_mears AT softhome DOT net> escribió:
>
>><snip>
>>>
>>> > Like 'char' is always 1 byte.
>>>
>>> That's not true, either.  There are compilers (mostly for embedded
>>> systems) where `char' is 32-bit wide.
>>>
>>
>>I thought the ANSI standard said that 'char' must be one byte wide.  Am
>>I wrong, or are those compilers non-standard?
>
>You are right. It is simply that a byte can be 32-bit wide for some
>systems.

Well, then all PC-compilers should use 8-bit=char so I think that's portable
enough. I suppose we don't do any embedded systems here, or?

>
>Regards:
>GUILLE
>----
>Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
>XXguille AT XXiies DOT XXes (ya sabes :-)
>

- Raw text -