delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se (Martin Str|mberg) |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: INT in INT handler |
Date: | 6 Apr 1999 05:43:08 GMT |
Organization: | University of Lulea, Sweden |
Message-ID: | <7ec6tc$a1l$1@news.luth.se> |
References: | <7e7ibo$cr4$3 AT news DOT luth DOT se> <37082B22 DOT B96BA80D AT cartsys DOT com> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | queeg.ludd.luth.se |
X-Newsreader: | TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0] |
Lines: | 15 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Nate Eldredge (nate AT cartsys DOT com) wrote: : The INT instruction works even with interrupts disabled. How can that be? How can I issue an INT when interrupts are disabled? : Whether the other INT 0x31 handler is okay with having interrupts : disabled on entry is another question, though. But I suspect it's : probably okay. Aren't interrupts disabled on entry of an interrupt handler? Arnold, Symphony No. 3, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |