Message-ID:	<014001be7933$de711b00$59e004d0@bowman>
From:	"robert bowman" <bowman AT montana DOT com>
To:	<djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<199903260517 DOT AAA32193 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <36FBE6A6 DOT D1407A64 AT cableol DOT co DOT uk> <bpmurray*STUFFER*-2603991904090001 AT macmac-2 DOT ucsf DOT edu> <36FCFE36 DOT F34D5AC AT a DOT crl DOT com> <7dknhp$gq8$1 AT nnrp1 DOT dejanews DOT com>
Subject:	Re: DJGPP: the future is... ?
Date:	Sun, 28 Mar 1999 08:58:47 -0700
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-Mimeole:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

From: <walt121 AT my-dejanews DOT com>
>
> (LCC is a port of gcc to Win 95, and is  free, but no longer supported.)
Why do I use
> LCC?  Because I didn't have to  struggle with it.  Its installer worked
correctly, the first
> time.

Actually, Jacob Navia updated the binaries to fix a bug in make.exe just
this morning, and there is an active newgroup, comp.compiler.lcc, devoted to
it. There is a charge for the source to offset some of the expenses, US$40
iirc, but the executables and documentation are free.

It is a clean solution, as is the Pacific package for non-GUI C. If I see a
post  "I have never programmed in my life, can barely find the 'on' switch,
but have heard about this 'C' stuff and would like to try it", I'll gently
point them to Pacific, while mentioning djgpp as the next step when the
training wheels come off.

The setup problem is not unique to djgpp. Before JDK1.2, setting the
classpath stopped most Java newbies in their tracks, and the most popular
question is still "where can I find an IDE?"

- Raw text -