From:	"Paganini <Nathan E. Banks>" <paganini AT madisontelco DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Assembler types
Date:	Sat, 6 Mar 1999 19:56:43 -0600
Organization:	Info Avenue Internet Services
Lines:	18
Message-ID:	<7bsmc2$rvt$1@news3.infoave.net>
References:	<7bran9$eoh$1 AT news3 DOT infoave DOT net> <MxfBZaB97W42Ewiz AT xemu DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> <7bsfcn$2rb$1 AT news3 DOT infoave DOT net> <K76gLzApnc42EwDt AT xemu DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ham107.madisontelco.com
X-Trace:	news3.infoave.net 920771778 28669 206.28.233.107 (7 Mar 1999 01:56:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT news3 DOT infoave DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date:	7 Mar 1999 01:56:18 GMT
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.0810.800
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0810.800
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Dave Bird <dave AT xemu DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> wrote in message
news:K76gLzApnc42EwDt AT xemu DOT demon DOT co DOT uk...

> Oh yes, all produce the same machine code.  But native GNU does it
> in vax-style code "mov $15,%eax"
> and MASM/NASM in Intel-style "mov eax,15".

So neither one is really better than the other...it's just religious...like
whether to comment or to document?

--
Paganini <Nathan E. Banks>
MOOk, the Great High Llama
ICQ 25308827
http:\\web.madisontelco.com\~paganini

- Raw text -