Date:	Sun, 21 Feb 1999 13:17:52 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
cc:	DJGPP <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: make crash
In-Reply-To:	<199902181951.UAA05608@father.ludd.luth.se>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990221131728.6539J-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Martin Str|mberg wrote:

> > Why would you need that?  AFAIK, -bash is only needed in interactive
> > invocation, to make it a login shell, but should never be necessary
> > (and could be even dangerous) after that.
> 
> Because it's the right thing to do(tm)! Because DOZE has no sense of
> logging in, every invocation of the shell must be a log in shell

I still don't get why is it ``the right thing to do''.  There should
be only one login shell: the first instance of Bash.  Every other
instance that is subsidiary to the first one, should NOT be the login
shell.

> Call frame traceback EIPs:
>   0x0001c6b0   ___djgpp_traceback_exit+48
>   0x0001c792   _raise+94
>   0x0001f403   _abort+27
>   0x00026f22   __put_path2+58
>   0x00026ecd   __put_path+13
>   0x0002a40e   __chmod+58
>   0x00021ddd   _remove+61
>   0x0001b51f   _system+699

This indicates that `system' called `remove' with a NULL pointer
instead of a file name.  You need to look for a reason for this.

> As far as I could trace it, it's the call to system() that
> crashes. How do I step into system with gdb?

Compile system.c with -g, put it into the library, and have its source
in the same directory where you run the debugger.

- Raw text -