Mail Archives: djgpp/1999/01/29/20:16:02
In article <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 19990129173547 DOT 008383b0 AT pop DOT netaddress DOT com>,
Paul Derbyshire <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>At 06:55 PM 1/28/99 GMT, you wrote:
>
>A year ago I seem to recall someone saying they'd get gcc/egcs up to being
>reasonably compatible with ANSI C++ in a year...which has now elapsed. Has
>somebody been reneging?
You do know that a large percentage of GCC development is done by
unpaid volunteers, right?
The C++ language conformance in EGCS is better than 90% of the commercial
offerings right now. The standard library, and the sore spot ;-), is
being worked on.
To be quite honest, I'm beginning to smell a troll here.
Regards,
Mumit
- Raw text -