X-Authentication-Warning:	ieva01.lanet.lv: pavenis owned process doing -bs
Date:	Thu, 28 Jan 1999 13:52:34 +0200 (WET)
From:	Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
cc:	Artur Zaroda <zaroda AT ghost DOT mimuw DOT edu DOT pl>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: cxxfilt.exe in bnu281b.zip and gxx.exe in djdev202.zip
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990128134109.16407E-100000@is>
Message-ID:	<Pine.A41.4.05.9901281350340.33180-100000@ieva01.lanet.lv>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> 
> On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Andris Pavenis wrote:
> 
> > > Isn't it better to remove -lgpp at all?  I don't think g++ on Unix does 
> > > that anymore, does it?
> > 
> > Of course. If we are removing -lgpp from gxx.exe then I
> > think there is no more any need for it except than linking libm.a.
> 
> What about -lstdcxx?  That one still needs to be mentioned.
> 
> As for -lm, I always thought that some classes in libstdcxx.a require 
> libm.a.  Isn't that correct anymore?
> 

No problems. I tested that gpp.exe from gcce111b.zip and also g++.exe
from egcs-1.1.1 under Linux links also libm. So if we are dropping 
-lgpp in gxx.exe in djdev then there is no more need for it at all.

Andris

- Raw text -