Message-Id:	<3.0.1.16.19990126153027.2cbfb53a@shadow.net>
X-Sender:	ralphgpr AT shadow DOT net
X-Mailer:	Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (16)
Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:30:27
To:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
From:	Ralph Proctor <ralphgpr AT shadow DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Some Systems Defined
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<199901262015.PAA24638@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<3 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 16 DOT 19990126151144 DOT 1a4fb236 AT shadow DOT net>
	<3 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 16 DOT 19990126113745 DOT 1fe79d02 AT shadow DOT net>
	<3 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 16 DOT 19990126113745 DOT 1fe79d02 AT shadow DOT net>
	<3 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 16 DOT 19990126151144 DOT 1a4fb236 AT shadow DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

At 03:15 PM 1/26/99 -0500, you wrote:
>
>> I don't think DOSEMU is a operating system, is it?
>
>DOSEMU is a dos emulator.  It gives you a "dos box" under Linux, much
>like the dos boxes in Windows 9x or NT.
>
>> DOSEMU is the main reason I would always have to have DOS in addtion
>> to a Linux system because I want to program with DJGPP without
>> having to use it--I'd rather not use an emulator for that purpose.
>
>Why not run djgpp under dosemu?

1. I've gotten so used to djgpp under DOS.
2. Thinking maybe I'll have problems.

DJ: Would I get the same quality and trouble-freeness if I ran DJGPP and
it's associated
programs and utilities exclusively with Linux? Hey that would be great!!! I
just assumed
the best way would be to only use Linux for the GUI and online interfaces
and stick with
DOS for C.

Honestly, I don't have a reason from experience. Are some of the DJGPP
programmers
using DOSEMU with success? I just assumed they were experimenting with it.

Please advise.

- Raw text -