Mail Archives: djgpp/1999/01/04/17:26:33
Sorry, that was my info. Perhaps I shouldn't trust peoples info on the debian
newsgroup as much as that. I went to that windows site, and (probably because
my search was too brief) I couldn't find anything about dos at all.
What I heard was that microsoft were breaking dos support to make Win 2000 more
stable.
Peter Allen
taxman. wrote:
>
> If you travel over to the Win2000 product page on www.microsoft.com/windows/
> it looks like they actually increased support for DOS. Whoever got the info
> that it doesn't support DOS was wrong.
>
> <dinggoum AT 163 DOT net> wrote in message
> news:199901031437 DOT JAA05213 AT delorie DOT com...
> >What is MS's exact meaning about that W2K will not support dos?
> >
> >(a) needn't dos , run dos program as well as win9x .
> >(b) can't boot from dos , run dos program well .
> >(c) run dos program like in NT console .
> >(d) can't use anything about dos .
> >
> >What can we do to let MS know that it's a wrong way
> >if the answer is (d)?
- Raw text -