Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/11/09/12:00:17
Date: | Mon, 9 Nov 1998 11:59:51 -0500 (EST)
|
Message-Id: | <199811091659.LAA03061@indy.delorie.com>
|
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
|
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
In-reply-to: | <36466615.E35B7224@cartsys.com> (message from Nate Eldredge on
|
| Sun, 08 Nov 1998 19:48:37 -0800)
|
Subject: | Re: List header munging [Possibly OT] [Was: Graphics in C]
|
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
> But I'd like to take this opportunity to ask how people feel about the
> new feature of the listserv that makes the "Reply-To" address
> <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>.
Before I did that, people were complaining that their default
"reply-to" didn't work because of all the anti-spam addresses. Plus,
some threads were getting huge CC lists, and for some people (like me)
mailing list mail goes into a different bucket than private mail, so
these threads pollute my private bucket even when the mail isn't
directed at me personally.
- Raw text -