delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-ID: | <364327AC.7D25E209@cleansoft.com> |
Date: | Fri, 06 Nov 1998 09:45:32 -0700 |
From: | Michael Deck <deckm AT cleansoft DOT com> |
Organization: | Cleanroom Software Engineering, Inc. |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) |
X-Accept-Language: | en |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Moving from libgpp _string to standard |
Lines: | 16 |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | 199.45.153.2 |
X-Trace: | 6 Nov 1998 09:46:16 +0700, 199.45.153.2 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
I wanted to upgrade my gcc environment from 2.7.2.1 to 2.8.1. At the same time, I'd like to eliminate my dependence on libgpp -- it sounds like its use is deprecated in favor of the STL (correct me if I'm wrong). The 2.8.1 information seems to be saying that all the functionality of libgpp is now in STL. That may be true, but I am having trouble finding the String class. I've got an app that's pretty heavily dependent on having that functionality or its close equivalent. Is there a way to get this without libgpp or should I just stick with that? If it's the latter, can someone help me understand the long-term direction for libgpp, both in DJGPP and in GNU? My Unix sysadmin is balking at upgrading it because he says it's use is deprecated. Thanks, Mike
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |