Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
From:	"Mike Ruskai" <thanny AT spambegone DOT home DOT com>
Message-ID:	<gunaalubzrpbz.f1cmla2.pminews@news.avnl1.nj.home.com>
References:	<5zeY1.843$SI2 DOT 270 AT news DOT cwix DOT com> <gunaalubzrpbz DOT f1bmi21 DOT pminews AT news DOT avnl1 DOT nj DOT home DOT com> <3631E505 DOT 4773CBD3 AT montana DOT com>
X-Newsreader:	PMINews 2.00.1201 For OS/2
Organization:	TLF
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: construction has been delayed due to somebody's stupidity (most likely my own)
Lines:	119
Date:	Sat, 24 Oct 1998 20:36:52 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	24.3.130.120
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Sat, 24 Oct 1998 13:36:52 PDT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, 24 Oct 1998 08:32:37 -0600, bowman wrote:

>
>
>Mike Ruskai wrote:
>> 
>> Well, the first thing I have to say is that your example does not demonstrate
>> the problem you indicate when I try to compile it, with no less than four
>> compilers (IBM VisualAge C++, Borland C++, GNU GCC, and DJGPP).
>
>yeah, but try the non-trivial snippet for interesting errors:
>
><-------------------------  badcode.cpp ---------------------->
>#include <iostream.h>
>
>class MyClass {
>public:
>    MyClass();
>    void say_hi(void);
>protected:
>    int data;
>};
>
>void MyClass::say_hi(void) {
>    cout << "hello world\n";
>}
>
>
>int main(void)
>{
>    MyClass instance();  // point of interest
>    instance.say_hi();
>}
>
><--------------------------- end:   badcode.cpp 
>----------------------->

This is bad code indeed, for you are declaring but not defining the default
constructor.

In addition, you're not declaring the variable correctly.  If you're using
the default constructor (which means the constructor that takes no arguments,
whether or not you declared and defined it), you must not use empty
parentheses.  I wasn't sure about that, but I've since verified it.  When you
use empty parentheses, what you're actually doing is declaring a function
called "instance" that returns a MyClass object.

>or, for another variation on the theme,
>
><---------------------------  stillbad.cpp
>----------------------------->
>
>#include <iostream.h>
>
>class MyClass {
>public:
>    MyClass();
>    void say_hi(void);
>protected:
>    int data;
>};
>
>void MyClass::say_hi(void) {
>    cout << "hello world\n";
>}
>
>int main(void)
>{
>    MyClass instance;  // point of interest
>    instance.say_hi();
>}
>
><------------------------------  end: stillbad.cpp
>-------------------------->

This is bad solely because you're declaring a constructor without defining
it.  Your linker should give you an unresolved external error.  

>this one actually compiles and executes under gcc. I don't know if the
>proir two will
>make it through any compiler, but I would be suspicious of a compiler
>that did accept them.
>
><------------------------------  end: thisworks.cpp
>-------------------------->
>
>
>#include <iostream.h>
>
>class MyClass {
>public:
>	MyClass() {};
>	void say_hi(void);
>protected:
>	int data;
>};
>
>void MyClass::say_hi(void) {
>	cout << "hello world\n";
>}
>
>int main(void)
>{
>    	MyClass instance();  // point of interest
>	instance.say_hi();
>}
>
><------------------------------  end: thisworks.cpp
>-------------------------->

This is bad because you're declaring a function instead of defining a
variable.

--
 - Mike

Remove 'spambegone' to send e-mail.

- Raw text -