Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/10/13/14:53:13
On Tue, 13 Oct 1998 15:57:26 +0200, Black Phantom <vadim AT arx DOT com>
wrote:
>The whole thing is utterly inefficient since dynamic linking was
>designed for sharing one copy of library among different address spaces.
>In DOS there is a single-tasking environment so DLL system will eat up a
>lot of memory, saving nothing. What do you need it for, what is the
>design goal?
Perhaps what I was looking for was more along the lines of a device
driver, rather than a DLL (is there a difference?). At first I wanted
to be able to read/write different file systems by writing seperate
external modules with common functions like WriteToDisk and
ReadFromDisk. Then, of course, by knowing which FS was in use, I would
simply choose which module to use.
- Hicks
- Raw text -