delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/08/01/04:31:10

Message-ID: <35C2D154.38C1393E@geocities.com>
From: Merlin <merlin__ AT geocities DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Hey Dim!!!
References: <19980712095140 DOT 17102 DOT qmail AT hotmail DOT com> <35C1D850 DOT BC0ED078 AT post DOT comstar DOT ru>
Lines: 160
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 1998 08:29:04 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 189-cy-wpg.ilos.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 01 Aug 1998 03:29:04 CDT
Organization: MBnet Networking Inc.
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp


Dim Zegebart wrote:

> Khoi N wrote:
>
> > Hey Dim,
> >
> >    Maybe ya didn't get my last email, or maybe your just really busy,
>
> > but here I am again.  Well I didn't get a reply on the last email, and I
>
> > just wanted to give it another try.
>
> Oops, I have replayed your post and just forward that msg to you again.Sorry
> for delay with this msg, I was in month's holiday and recently come back.
>
> > Well what I asked before was: is it
> > possible for two computers to connect using the modem,  with no active
> > phone line ( no dialtone,  NULL i guess you can call it that )? That is,
> > can you connect the computers using a direct phone line to each of them?
> > My friend and I live kind of far from each other,  and testing the modem
> > is a real hassle.  And most of the time my friend is busy and is unable
> > to help me in my quest to achieve modem-programing victory.  If you can
> > answer this question for me,  I would greatly appreciate it.  And if
> > such a thing is possible, how do you do it?  I am no modem expert
> > what-so-ever, and I must seem like a little programmer compared to such
> > an experienced programer as you!
>
> Thank you for many good words I just a man as you :)Only few models of modem
> allows you connect directly without number dialing.
> It connects via so called privet circuit. This privet circuit should be
> provided by your
> local phone operator for additional fee. This is exactly I connect my PC at
> work
> (I'm working at telephone company, so privet circuit is not a problem)
> But I suppose what you are interesting in connecting two modems on your
> table
> just via two wires, unfortunately, only few from few modems capable to do it
> and it
> costs much money. Actually, I know only one such modem it's old UK made
> device
> with highest baud rate 1200.

Sorry for butting in on your conversation here but i have something you may like
to know...I have a zoltrix 56k flex modem (model FM-VSP56i2).. it is capable of
connecting to another modem without a dialtone or phone number... I just have to
take the plug from the wall and plug it into another modem's in jack and type
ATX3DT on the 56k one and ATA (will not detect a ring so you cant use auto
answer) on the answering modem whatever it may be. and They would connect....
Quite a nice feature i must say.. since i'v got 2 computers... and it was less
than $100 :)



>
>
> > Sorry to bother you again,  but I got
> > another question that I'd like to ask.  I have used the library to
> > program the modem,  and I can't seem to find a way to detect rings when
> > my friend calls.  Instead I have to enter ATA manually.  Is there a way
> > to detect rings and connect modems automatically?  Please answer this
> > question,  I'm dying to know the answer.  A problem I've experienced
> > with the library was using the comm_port_command _send() function.  When
> > I call it, using one of the AT commands, it works fine.  But the problem
> > is when I send two or more commands after it in a sequense, the commands
> > don't make it through.  For example:
> >
> >
>
> From dzcomm.txt
>
> int (*msr_handler)() - you may provide handler for
>   'modem status register change' interrupt. Declare this handler as :
>   int my_msr_handler(int c). This handler will be called by a system
>   with c=inportb(port->MSR).
>   Note : since this handler called inside interrupt handler keep it
>   fast and small as possible. Take care about stuff you do inside, and
>   don't forget to lock this code in memory.
>   See also : comm_port_init.
>
> int RingStatus;
>
> int my_msr_handler(int msr_value)
> {
>    if (msr_value&0x08) RingStatus=1;
>   return(0);
> }ring()
> {
>   ....
>   RingStatus=0;
> }
>
> int main(int argc,char argv[])
> { comm_port *myport;
>   char c;
> ..
>   myport->msr_handler=my_msr_handler;
>  ...
>  while(1)
>   { ...
>     if (RingStatus==1) ring();
>     ...
>   }
>
>  return(0);
> }
>
> > comm_port *myport;
> > char c;
> > ...
> > ...
> > comm_port_command_send(myport,"ATZ\r");  //Inits modem
> > comm_port_command_send(myport,"ATH\r");  // Hangs up modem
> > comm_port_command_send(myport,"ATE1\r"); // Turns on echoing, sends
> > //  commands back to buffer
> > while(c=comm_port_test(myport)) {
> > putc(c);
> > }
> >
> >
>
> comm_port_command_send() sends '\r' for you, so just send AT command with
> out '\r' at the end
>
> > This gives and output of:
> >
> > ATZ
> > OK
> >
> > That's it!  This must be a delay problem of some sort.  Is there a way
> > to delay execution until each command has been succesfully sent?  If
> > there is a way,  just tell me what to do and I'll try to pitch in and
> > write the code to put in that delay.
> >
>
> Search Allegro' doc for timer section ( I can't remember the exact delay
> function name)
>
> > Thanks so much for listening to me again Dim.  Please answer my
> > questions,  I'm just so anxious for answers.  You've been a great
> > listener,  and I just appreciate all the work and help that you've
> > given.  Please write back!
>
> You are welcome.
>
> PS. I double this msg in djgpp mail list.
>
> --
> ____ ____
> |   \   /   Dim Zegebart
> ____/____
>
> Moscow Russia
> WWW - http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/pines/7817
> DZcomm - comm library for Allegro
> Palantir - multitasking kernel for Allegro (based on PDMLWP)



- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019