Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/06/28/10:12:11
Gerhard Gruber wrote:
>
> >- It's true that DJGPP installation is somewhat more complex than the
> >average Borland installation, at least at first. However, the vast
>
> Complex? Unzipping the various packages, setting up the PATH and DJGPP
> environment variables and starting to work is complex? :))) The only "complex"
> thing about DJGPP is to decide which packages to download. But only until you
> read the FAQ and see what you need.
DJGPP installation is complex compared to putting a disk in the drive
and running SETUP.EXE. Personally, I'm used to downloading files,
creating a directory, unzipping, and editing my autoexec.bat. Others
don't always have the benefit of this experience.
It's not _difficult_, but it does require that a person actually read
the instructions.
> Another drawback (as I see it) of these integrated environments is, that there
> are students that don't even know that a C sourcefile is plain ASCII because
> they never looked out of MSVC or whatever IDE they are using.
I agree with this one; it's come up several times.
> And another advantage: After W95 is crashed and you had to reinstall try to
> run MSVC or Borland C right after it. No way. You have to reinstall it
> completly loosing all changes you did to the environment and can't remeber
> anymore because you did it some time ago. DJGPP is up and running a few
> minutes after initial installation and at once after a crash.
I didn't know that; I've never had a copy of one of those compilers to
play with in Win95. Sounds like another good reason to use DJGPP.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| John M. Aldrich | "If 'everybody knows' such-and-such, |
| aka Fighteer I | then it ain't so, by at least ten |
| mailto:fighteer AT cs DOT com | thousand to one." |
| http://www.cs.com/fighteer | - Lazarus Long |
---------------------------------------------------------------------
- Raw text -