From:	sl AT psycode DOT com DOT NOSPAM (Gili)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: REQUEST: PGCC v1.02 for DOS
Date:	23 May 1998 05:10:31 GMT
Organization:	All USENET -- http://www.Supernews.com
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<bWLoegW7sFse-pn2-KBoONRBUd7dn@portA55.Generation.NET>
References:	<bWLoegW7sFse-pn2-fNemd9r3ireD AT portF11 DOT Generation DOT NET> <6k48sr$54s$1 AT rosenews DOT rose DOT hp DOT com>
Reply-To:	sl AT psycode DOT com DOT NOSPAM
NNTP-Posting-Host:	205.205.118.65
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

On Fri, 22 May 1998 16:25:01, "Andrew Crabtree" 
<andrewc AT rosemail DOT rose DOT hp DOT com> wrote:

> 
> Gili wrote in message ...
> > PGCC v1.02 is out and no one has volunteered to release the sources,
> >so . . . It's all up to _YOU_! :)
> You mean sources or binaries?  You can get the sources from the goof home
> page of course.  If you want my specific patches from the 1.0.1 distribution
> I can provide them as well.  But, since egcs 1.0.3 has been released I would
> think there will be a pgcc 1.0.3 soon too.  Don't look for binaries anytime
> soon though, I have no plans of making them.  AFAIK there is only a couple
> of fpu code gen fixes that could affect djgpp users, and nobody has ever hit
> them except in test cases.   I will be releasing a c only version of a may
> snapshot soon.  As for C++, the compiler itself works, but the egcs boys
> totally broke the configure mechanism for building libio again.

	I understand. So when can we expect an update to the PGCC binaries? 
When/if PGCC 1.0.4 is out and the configuration mechanism is fixed? If
so, great ;) Thank you for your help,

Gili

- Raw text -