From:	Eric Gillespie <root AT flying-brick DOT caverock DOT net DOT nz>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Bash as the only shell
Date:	Sat, 23 May 1998 11:12:47 +1200
Organization:	Cave Rock Internet (http://www.caverock.net.nz)
Lines:	11
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.91.980523111044.198B-100000@flying-brick.caverock.net.nz>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 980508124104 DOT 9473L-100000 AT is> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 980508122809 DOT 18417C-100000 AT kng506 DOT unh DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	202.37.100.19
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.3.96.980508122809.18417C-100000@kng506.unh.edu>
Cache-Post-Path:	hydrogen.caverock.co.nz!unknown AT tc1-39 DOT caverock DOT net DOT nz
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

On Fri, 8 May 1998, arkane wrote:
>  Under win95 I almost strictly use bash as my
> operations shell, switching to command.com after I am sure an application
> won't accept bash.
I have come across one of those programs myself - OpenDos's MEM
It says something strange, and it's related to how it tries to read the 
commandline - I guess BASH just handles it different...

Anyway, enough blathering from me - I must go...
The Viking

- Raw text -