delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "Andrew Crabtree" <andrewc AT rosemail DOT rose DOT hp DOT com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: COFF obsolete, let's port to Elf for version 3 |
Date: | Wed, 20 May 1998 13:37:05 -0700 |
Organization: | Hewlett-Packard, Roseville |
Lines: | 16 |
Message-ID: | <6jveti$21e$1@rosenews.rose.hp.com> |
References: | <m0ybP3H-000S3GC AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> <6jpugg$luo$1 AT rosenews DOT rose DOT hp DOT com> <LTV1OBA+LeY1Ews4 AT talula DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> <6jss3q$s86$1 AT rosenews DOT rose DOT hp DOT com> <35629862 DOT FB32B700 AT taniwha DOT tssc DOT co DOT nz> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | ros51675cra.rose.hp.com |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Bill Currie wrote in message <35629862 DOT FB32B700 AT taniwha DOT tssc DOT co DOT nz>... >Just how offensive would it be to say "stuff section 1-17, backwards >compatability is more important than strict ELF compliance, heck, it's >only symbols"? Dunno. Possibly it wouldn't make any difference at all. Worst case is that a leading '-' has special meaning in elf files and it would have references strewn all over binutils. > It's not as if linking Linux object files with DJGPP >ones will work anyway, due to the different syscall conventions Whats the difference? From the sample of code that goes through the pgcc list I got the impression that they are identical.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |